Climate Finance Obligations: A Call to Action for Developed Nations

The Urgent Need for Climate Justice

By Moraa Nyangorora

Civil society groups are worried about the precarious state of climate negotiations at COP30.

Developing nations emphasise that Brazil’s new fossil transition and forest roadmaps could collapse without meaningful financial support.

As negotiations enter the final stretch, the anticipated climate package remains elusive.

Despite Brazil's promising roadmaps on transitioning from Fossil Fuels and Forests, there is a growing sense of urgency among developing nations.

“But with two days left to go, the whole package is quite fragile. Unless we get the full package of finance, fairness, and just transition for communities, COP30’s potential promise of a fossil fuel phase-out could prove a mirage.”

— Teresa Anderson, ActionAid’s Global Lead on Climate Justice

For the Global South, the stakes are existential.

Without predictable climate finance, adaptation resources, and just-transition guarantees, countries facing climate shocks risk deeper debt, job losses, and widening poverty.

Key Issues at COP30

Negotiations at COP30 are intense, focusing on several critical issues: climate finance, adaptation funding, loss and damage mechanism, fossil fuel phase-out roadmap, forest protection and a just transition framework that safeguards workers and communities.

Developing nations are demanding predictable support and equity. However, some developed countries resist binding commitments, creating tension over ambition versus fairness.

The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ) accuses wealthy nations of blocking progress on finance.

They argue that without honouring Paris Agreement commitments, the burden of transition will fall hardest on communities with the fewest resources.

ActionAid International is also calling for the full package of financing to cushion vulnerable communities from the impact of the shift to clean and green energy.

“To keep the planet under 1.5°C warming, the fossil era has to end, and soon. But big change poses major risks for the workers, communities, and countries that currently depend on them. Unless real climate finance or just transition approaches are in place, hits to jobs and economies could end up increasing inequality and poverty.”

The Just Transition Dilemma

The unresolved just transition question looms large. In Africa, coal-dependent communities, including thousands of workers in South Africa’s mining heartlands, face major job losses without retraining, social protection, and investment.

Proposals on the table include: Just Transition Plans, National social dialogue mechanisms, Worker-protection guarantees and International funding windows specifically earmarked for coal-dependent regions.

For many in the Global South, a fair transition is not just climate policy; it is economic survival.

Earlier this week, Action Aid called for a Belem Action Mechanism. This mechanism would guarantee a global approach to coordination, shared learning, and support for implementing a just transition.

The Global Lead for climate justice, Teresa Anderson, emphasised the critical needs of people at the heart of the transition.

She urged wealthy polluting countries to provide trillions of dollars in grant-based climate finance every year to Global South countries.

Under the Paris Agreement, developed countries committed to mobilising USD 100 billion per year by 2020 to support adaptation and mitigation in developing nations.

However, much of the finance delivered is in loans rather than grants, leaving many vulnerable countries at risk.

The Path Forward: New Collective Quantified Goal

COP30 discussions now aim to establish a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG).

This goal could potentially reach USD 300 billion per year by 2035, with additional mechanisms to scale up finance to USD 1.3 trillion annually.

The Role of Civil Society

Civil society warns that without predictable, grant-based finance, developing countries cannot transition away from fossil fuels or protect populations from worsening climate disasters.

Networks such as ActionAid, DCJ, CAN-International, and regional grassroots movements are escalating pressure through public campaigns. They are employing naming-and-shaming strategies, litigation, and real-time monitoring of climate finance pledges.

They insist that unless developed countries face consequences for failing to deliver, the Paris Agreement risks becoming a voluntary pledge rather than a global contract for survival.

Bark, Culture, and Climate: How Indigenous Knowledge in Buganda Weaves Art, Heritage, and Conservation

By N. Moraa Nyangorora

Artwork by Fred Mpanga painting on Tree Bark- A tradition of the Baganda Kingdom in Uganda

A tradition, older than colonial borders and modern factories, transforming nature into cloths that weave these beautiful artistic pieces, lives, and is vibrant in Uganda, Africa.

Long before weaving looms arrived, the Baganda were creating cloth.

The bark cloth making is a a deeply rooted tradition passed down lineages among the Ngonge clan in Buganda, whose hereditary craftsment known as Kaboggoza have preserved the skill for centuries.

Fred Mpanga an artist from the Buganda Kingdom In Uganda explains this tradition to a team of journalists who visited his gallery in Entebbe, Uganda

This is just not a cultural relic, but a powerful expression of indigenous knowledge, climate resilience and intergenerational heritage , all packaged in hued textile.

The amazing artwork, is a demonstration of cultural preservation that is relevant to modern life. The cloth from the tree bark is also used by women during their menstrual cycle, as blankets, clothes and other fabrics.

This art culturally referred to as Olubugo, from the inner bark of the Mutuba tree (Ficus natalensis), continues to date albeit in small scale.

They harvest the inner bark of the Mutuba tree during the wet season expanding it to pliable sheets.

Artist Mpanga explains the work that goes into turning the bark tree into a smooth canvas

Mpanga one of the Baganda sons, is keeping this skill alive, displaying his beautiful paintings with bark of this tree as his canvas.

This cultural practice highlights the magnificence of nature that contributes to the protection and preservation of the Mutuba tree.

This ensures raw materials are readily available enhancing sustainability of this tradition, promoting environmental conservation.

Mpanga says the tree is a gem that the community cherishes and conserves.

This tradition of using the bark cloth is recognised by UNESCO and is listed as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity (originally proclaimed in 2005).

Environmental and Climate Significance

In addition to its many properties, the Mutuba tree a cultural resource, is significant ecologically.

Farmers in Uganda retain it in their farms to help protect soil fertility.

Its leaves that drop on the ground improve moisture retention and stabilises the soil.

By Michaelwild at English Wikipedia & Purves, M, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15066825

Its presence in agro forestry systems (Coffee and banana plants) helps crops better survive dry spells and promotes resilient farming.

Photo by Bruttos courtesy Pixabay

The tree is also instrumental in carbon sequestration as demonstrated in the "Energy Gardens" initiative. UNFCCC 

Under this project, households plant Ficus natalensis trees paired with energy-efficient cookstoves.

They provide shade, improve soil, and create biomass; as branches regrow, they supply sustainable firewood or fodder, reducing pressure on forests and lowering carbon emissions. UNFCCC

The traditional harvesting of bark for olubugo is done in a way that does not kill the tree. The outer bark is removed carefully, and the tree is wrapped or treated so it can heal and regenerate. mysite 

By Joyce Nanjobe Kawooya joycenanjobekawooya@gmail.com - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64116783

This means a single Mutuba can yield bark for decades.

Interestingly, the bark cloth itself has been studied for antimicrobial properties: traditional bark cloth made from Ficus natalensis showed strong inhibitory effects against MRSA, a dangerous drug-resistant bacterium. PubMed

This suggests that the material has not only cultural and environmental value, but potential health applications too.

Threats, Climate Risks, and Cultural Conservation

Despite its importance, both the Mutuba tree and the craft of bark cloth face significant pressures that include deforestation and exploitation.

The Mutuba is threatened in some areas by charcoal burning, brick-making, and the harvesting of wood for firewood — all more immediately profitable than making cloth. Monitor

There is also the threat of loss of indigenous Knowledge.

Mpanga confirms that the current generation is not as interested in gaining this skill which he says requires passion and interest, some of the tools, mallets, and specialised skills have few inheritors. Horizon Documentation

Mpanga says he stumbled by this skill while on some part time work at the University of Makerere.

A Professor in fine Art Musoke Yusuf, who was then, entering retirement experimented with bark art.

Prior to this experiment of painting on the bark tree, only printing on the bark was carried out. Prof Musoke guided Mpanga on how to handle the bark tree, what paints to use, and how to use them.

Among the five that Professor Musoke trained, Mpanga is the only one who expressed interest. Even though he proceeded to college and studied other subjects, he took up the skill upon graduating.

"I have been painting for the last 23 years on tree bark canvas. This skill has been around from the 1300s. I use both powder water based paints (mixed with wood glue) and acrylics.

Fred Mpanga

While agroforestry helps, climate change still poses risks. Increased drought, erratic rain patterns, or tree diseases could stress Mutuba populations, reducing their capacity to regenerate bark and sustain local economies.

Yet, the very practice of cultivating Mutuba trees for bark cloth offers a climate-positive model: it encourages the planting of indigenous trees, supports soil health, reduces deforestation pressure, and keeps alive a craft that embodies local identity.

Food Justice Activists at COP30 Warn of Corporate Takeover of Global Food Policy

By Moraa Nyangorora

Food justice activists at COP30 are opposed to the continued heavy financing of corporations at the expense of local solutions.

They are warning that corporate influence over global food and climate negotiations is worsening hunger and accelerating emissions, as tangible solutions remain ignored.

Campaigners in Belem, Brazil, at COP30 say the move derails climate justice and real action, while increasing resources to polluting industries.

Brazil is publicly funding powerful agribusiness giants with about $105 billion.

The support for industrial agriculture is seen to be in conflict with its climate leadership position as negotiated at COP27 in Egypt in 2022.

World leaders negotiated climate financing, loss and damage, adaptation, and global commitments to reduce emissions.

Because the large amount is available to big producers, it raises concerns about environmental impact (deforestation, monoculture) and social equity (smallholder farmers, land access.

Addressing the media at Belem, the activists said the increasing funding to corporates only serves to offer industrial agriculture more influence over climate policy while sidelining smallholder farmers and indigenous communities.

They condemned the creation of a COP30 Agri zone sponsored by Nestlé and Bayer.

Photo courtesy Bianka Csenki- Artivist Network

The activists expressed dissatisfaction over the delay in implementing the Sharm-el Sheikh Joint Work on Agriculture in the face of the 2026 deadline.

Negotiations on climate finance remain stalled, exposing communities, mainly in the global south, to rising food insecurity.

Food, land and water are human rights, instead of protecting these rights, governments are pandering to corporates".

Pang Delgra- Asian Peoples' Movement on Debt and Development

The activists are pushing for agro ecology, food sovereignty and just transitions as proven, scalable solutions capable of reducing emissions and restoring ecosystems if governments commit to funding and protecting them.

Their rallying call: "Food for People, Not For Profit."

The issues raised at COP30 affect millions of African farmers.

While funding flows overwhelmingly to industrial agriculture, foreign corporations and extractive supply chains, small-scale farmers in Kenya are proving that regenerative farming restores degraded soils, improves yields and strengthens resilience to climate impacts.

The resistance to corporate takeover will protect Africa too, in the face of a threat to land rights by industrial agriculture and monoculture, and underfunding of smallholder farmers who produce up to 70 per cent of the food produced.

The issue of GMOs, pesticides, and seed privatisation mirrors the global corporate influence that poses a threat to food security on the continent.

However, the activists are reminding the world that the real climate solutions are already feeding millions, rebuilding ecosystems and sustaining cultures.

They are urging governments to choose public good over corporate power.

The concern at COP30 is one to care about as it revolves around seed protection, soils, water and food sovereignty amidst growing global corporate control.

The Brazilian Government released R$516.2 billion(about USD 100billion) through its annual Harvest Plan(Plano Safra).

This is the country's main public financing program for agriculture.

The funds are targeted to large agri-business corporations, big producers who typically access state-backed credit for operations.

This includes sectors dominated by giants like JBS, the world's largest meat producer.

The funds are government-secured loans and subsidies for expanding production, financing equipment, marketing agricultural products, operational costs and partly for sustainable farming practices.